English   |   ไทย
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Organizations
  • Resources
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us

Home Archives
FAQs

1. What is Micro-Credit?


2. What is a MFI?


3. Who are the clients of microfinance?


4. How does microfinance help the poor?


5. Aren't the poor too poor to save?


6. Why do MFIs charge such high interest rates to poor people?


more FAQs...

Events

July-Oct 2009 - Microfinance Training of Trainers Course
»An online training program for people interested in microfinance. Course materials are in English and in Thai.


21-25 September 2009 - Second ECHO Agricultural Conference (Chiang Mai)


Home


12 January, 2009

 

Corruption in Microfinance


By Tamsin Harriman at the Common Interest Foundation

Microfinance initiatives (MFIs) have largely been very successful in helping the poor around the world. However, there are occasionally some problems. One especially serious problem that MFIs can face is corruption. Since their clients are poor and often uneducated, it is easy for staff to take advantage of them. In fact, this is one of the reasons people get involved in microfinance to begin with - to stop poor people from being taken advantage of by moneylenders. Unfortunately, there are all too many possibilities for MFIs or their staff to engage in corrupt behavior themselves.

In Benin, West Africa, NGOs subcontracted by a large MFI have reportedly been taking bribes from borrowers and engaging in other corrupt activities. Due to rapid growth, the MFI has not been particularly scrupulous about the NGOs it subcontracts to. According to the above article, the MFI's director Komi Koutche says that "subcontracted local community associations are benefiting from borrowers’ desperation. 'Instead of taking US$2 in processing fees, they are charging [borrowers] up to $7. As long as the borrowers pay this willingly, we cannot stop it. It is only when they protest that we can intervene.'” They are also keeping funds that should be remitted to the MFI: "[According to] Benin’s Minister of Microfinance Reckya Madougou [...] recent studies revealed that loan intermediaries 'collect loan payments from borrowers promising to remit them to the fund’s partners [banks], but then do not do so.'”

Another form of corruption sometimes seen in MFIs is the use of extreme methods to coerce defaulting borrowers into repaying their loans. As detailed in the book What's Wrong With Microfinance? by Thomas Dichter and Malcolm Harper, pressure tactics can become so bad they could be considered bullying. In extreme cases, staff use tactics such as sitting outside defaulting borrowers' homes and refusing to let anyone in or out until the borrower repays her loan. Of course a high repayment rate is important for an MFI to be sustainable, and thus to continue helping the poor, but this is no excuse for such harrassment.

If commercial banks treated borrowers in these ways, it would be a major issue, covered by newspapers worldwide, and the bank would quickly lose all of its customers and quite likely be taken to court. Unfortunately, as in the Benin case above, corruption in MFIs goes largely unreported, as the poor people they serve depend on them and have no other options - if they need access to financial services, it's the MFI or nothing (except perhaps a moneylender who charges exorbitantly high interest rates).

Corruption in any organization is bad, but in an MFI it is especially so, since it perpetuates the helplessness that comes with being poor. MFIs should seek to alleviate poor people's helplessness, not to exacerbate it. Thankfully, corrupt practices are fairly rare in microfinance. Even so, MFIs should encourage their clients to speak up if an MFI staff member is doing something wrong. Hopefully if borrowers understand that it is okay, and even good, to speak up in such cases, then those who wish to take advantage of them will no longer be able to do so.



Comments:
Well, it might be a detail, but I do not see excessive pressure on clients for repayment as "corruption". And in fact, this pressure is important for an MFI in its relations with its clients. Some thoughts:

- An MFI should make a difference between clients who do not repay intentionnaly, and clients who are in economical difficulty due to an external event.

- An MFI should use legal means first (like reporting the defaulting client to the police). The problem is that in many countries, there is almost no effective legal means...

- If an MFI shows too much "kindness" vis-a-vis its defaulting borrowers, it will be quickly known among its clients, and its portfolio at risk will increase dramatically in few weeks! Firm and severe recovering procedures are key for an MFI.

- Excessive practices like the one you are reporting are often the fact of pressure on credit agents. Their remuneration is often indexed on performance ratios, like the number of clients they have, or how much of their clients are defaulting. Therefore, excessive practices are more an internal management issue (management of credit agents) that a problem of microfinance itself.

And about the case of corruption you are reporting, and Mr Komi Koutche words: "As long as the borrowers pay this willingly, we cannot stop it. It is only when they protest that we can intervene", I think he is wrong. A good, well managed MFI must have internal control procedures, and it is possible to control corruption among staff. In this case, he is clearly looking for excuses for poor management.

Best regards,

Benigne
# posted by Blogger Bénigne : January 14, 2009 at 11:22 PM
 

Post a Comment





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Home   |   About Us   |   Organization   |   Resources   |   FAQ   |   Contact Us

Copyright © 2009 MicroFinance Thailand. All Rights Reserved.